The Planetary Need for Balance versus Human Demand for Food
The idea of intensifying food production in order to support what will be a world population of 9 billion within a few decades is under real consideration, particularly with the release of a new scientific study which highlights the urgency of the situation.
The problem is caused by the misuse of agricultural land, food waste, the desire to switch to a “western” protein based diet in countries such as China and India, and, of course too many people being born. The solution, according to John Beddington, Britain’s Chief Scientist, is to allow population levels to peak naturally and meanwhile to develop technologies such as GM while devising ways to use potential and actual farming land as exhaustively as possible.
This approach focuses the debate entirely on the human needs and perspective without consideration for the other inhabitants of our planet, without whom we would not able to survive. Because we are dependent on the plants, animals and minerals for our well-being, does it not make sense to look after them to the best of our ability? It could be argued that their needs come before ours because they are so important in our lives.
If we treated a fellow human being as a machine to be exploited and then discarded, it would be considered extraordinary and unacceptable, but for the lower kingdoms of nature it is happening all the time all over the world, even now. When we have allowed abusive farming practices to occur, eventually she hits back with dramatic consequences, as we have seen with the outbreaks of BSE, Foot and Mouth and Avian Flu. There is no doubt that, if the human desire for a comfortable self-centred lifestyle is pursued at the expense of the planet, the planet will rebel, to our cost.
We can learn a lot by observing our natural environment, and how it keeps itself in balance - unless man intercedes! If a species becomes over-abundant then it will ensure the appropriate number for its survival is achieved whatever it takes: it may be disease, weather, lack of food, a new predator…….the outcome is a return to perfect equilibrium with everything in harmony. I have no doubt that, if our global human population is allowed to continue to grow far beyond what is tolerable, it will be reduced forcibly and perhaps painfully to what is acceptable.
The alternative is to confront the need now and to begin to discuss, at least, the problem of over-population and to consider ways of dealing with it. People will not want to hear, and it will be very controversial, but really, it must be done, publicly, internationally, and now.
Further detailed spiritual guidance is also available from Claire Montanaro in her workshops and one 2 one sessions

Anita Joice
said:
|
... Thank you for writing this. I have found many people in the West to express horror about the single child policy in China, but if they were here I think they could see that China could not be developing as it is without it. It seems obvious to control population or limit it to levels a society and land can handle, but I think there is such a strong attachment to individual wishes in the West that it brings up a lot of resistance. I'm not saying things are perfect here, not at all, but I think there is often a misunderstanding in the West about individual freedom always being superior. |
Edwina Fenwick
said:
|
... Living where I live it seems that food is overabundant, and there is too much at present. America would need to have another 500 million inhabitants before there would be a food shortage here. To make our food production more efficient, perhaps we could look at reducing meat production. Livestock rearing is one of the most inefficient methods of producing food (in terms of resources used vs food that is produced). There are several other solutions and innovations in existence already. Many answers are here already - it is a case of political and social will to adopt them. Governments setting up research committees is a way of avoiding the fact that the solutions are here now - a way of avoiding responsibility whilst not seeming to do so. |




